Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 23:06:04 -0500 From: "Scot Hetzel" <swhetzel@gmail.com> To: "Jiawei Ye" <leafy7382@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: portmaster, bison, java/jdk15 Message-ID: <790a9fff0608012106g57940fccl1dea421827e32196@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <c21e92e20608012050i4721f83er5d5a6c83e54d754@mail.gmail.com> References: <c21e92e20608012050i4721f83er5d5a6c83e54d754@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/1/06, Jiawei Ye <leafy7382@gmail.com> wrote: > 2. I just made a java/jdk15 yesterday, and the port gets updated > today, resulting in portmaster wanting to upgrade the port, but > portmaster will also try to install linux-sun-jdk15 as a dependancy on > JDK15. The normal situation is that when there is a native JDK/Diablo > present in the system, JDK15 port shouldn't depend on linux-sun-jdk > for bootstrapping. I am not sure if this is a problem with the jdk15 > port itself or not. doing "make clean" in java/jdk15 does list > linux-sun-jdk as a dependancy, but simple 'make install' will not pull > it in, is this contradictory? > No it's not contradictory, linux-sun-jdk is a build time dependance and is only needed to build java/jdk15. It is not need for JDK15 to run, this is why it is not listed as a dependancy during a 'make install'. Scot Scot -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?790a9fff0608012106g57940fccl1dea421827e32196>