From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 7 14:14:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BE916A420 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 14:14:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com) Received: from web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.207.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F02543D46 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 14:14:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 94259 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Mar 2006 14:14:31 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=z40Yqp9DVHHqxrFc5cMtfugvj/M3A1z8EMPdKGuzTGGUlZxTcmQLFMxxLdG1NAnfe+cZyupCztzNe37oDFBcN/Nm+7txBnxLm6jb0f2IyAZuXrd79+8AU0q92eRTSOAIioFPllJkUm80M1KNJVKTVIcgkFIjc4XEKRWBqHv7kN0= ; Message-ID: <20060307141431.94257.qmail@web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.118.66.85] by web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 15:14:31 CET Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 15:14:31 +0100 (CET) From: To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20060307025350.GA58236@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/91293: [svr4] [patch] *Experimental* Update to the SVR4 emulation (from NetBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 14:14:33 -0000 Hi; --- Kris Kennaway ha scritto: ... > > > > I have greatly reduced the size and scope of the patch by removing all > > the code for 64bit emulation and things that don't apply to FreeBSD > > (IRIX defines). > > It still works, right? :^) > What is left on the patch at this point are only bug fixes to panics and overflows from the NetBSD port. This is not something I can test on amd64 and rebuilding a kernel on qemu is painfully slow. Unfortunately the svr4 emulation is incomplete wrt NetBSD; there is some rather important code labelled "NOT_YET" that makes reference to UVM. I think the SVR4 emulation port still needs hacking from someone that knows well FreeBSD's inner workings, but there is lot of work done already and it is no doubt a very valuable effort in the light of OpenSolaris. cheers, Pedro ___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it