Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:52:39 -0400 From: Paul <paul@gtcomm.net> To: Ingo Flaschberger <if@xip.at> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Freebsd IP Forwarding performance (question, and some info) [7-stable, current, em, smp] Message-ID: <48682E57.8040509@gtcomm.net> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0806300214210.10999@filebunker.xip.at> References: <4867420D.7090406@gtcomm.net> <alpine.LFD.1.10.0806291255480.7208@filebunker.xip.at> <4867A9A1.9070507@gtcomm.net> <alpine.LFD.1.10.0806300105170.10999@filebunker.xip.at> <48681A3D.9040509@gtcomm.net> <alpine.LFD.1.10.0806300214210.10999@filebunker.xip.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well who wants to code it ? I would gladly pay someone to make it work the way I want. :) It needs to be able to do line rate gig-e with 64 byte packets and 250k routes. FBSD6 is definitely slower. Haven't tried dragonfly. Thanks Ingo Flaschberger wrote: > Dear Paul, > >> Yes it does but it seems to use a lot more of one cpu than the others >> so It's really not SMP.. Can I stop it from doing this with some >> setting? >> Why can't there be 4 taskq's? > > it is possible, but it need to be coded. > > hz 4000 is also too high, use 1000-2000 > http://www.tancsa.com/blast.html > >> Also with full internet table I can't even do 100kpps without >> errors.. I don't get it :/ I could do 300kpps on a p3 and now I have >> a 3ghz xeon and 2.2ghz opteron brand new hardware and can barely get >> more than that.. Doesn't make sense to me. > > have you tested with freebsd 6? > or try dragonfly? > > Kind regards, > Ingo Flaschberger > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48682E57.8040509>