Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 23:49:17 +0100 From: Svatopluk Kraus <onwahe@gmail.com> To: Andrew Turner <andrew@fubar.geek.nz> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: interrupt framework Message-ID: <CAFHCsPV1kCR4J6RmuVGJhoSBHFTHH3tV5wYFgDSskJkpKPELBg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20150115192624.122066dd@bender.lan> References: <CAFHCsPX5kG_v-F-cjpyMQsT_b386eok=mqWW0%2BEUb_4-_1Otnw@mail.gmail.com> <20150115192624.122066dd@bender.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Andrew Turner <andrew@fubar.geek.nz> wrote: > On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 14:51:17 +0100 > Svatopluk Kraus <onwahe@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi community, >> >> I and Michal Meloun have done some work on ARM interrupt framework and >> this is the result. > > I haven't ad a chance to look though it yet, but how does this compare > with what is currently on the arm_intrng branch? I've also taken Ian's > WIP change and cleaned it up so it will build with the current > interrupt framework. I've also been working on allowing the simplebus > changes to work on architectures that aren't arm. > I did not look at arm_intrng branch recently, so if there is any change this year I missed it. However, in general, the codes do same work but in slightly different way. However, IMHO, our design is more simple, more general, and more complete. > I'm planning on importing the branch into head soon, after fixing the > last few cross-arch issues, to allow for wider testing. > > Andrew Do what you must do. However, I think that our design is worth the look. Maybe it needs some polishing, but it's certainly worth the look. Svata
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFHCsPV1kCR4J6RmuVGJhoSBHFTHH3tV5wYFgDSskJkpKPELBg>