From owner-freebsd-bugs  Tue Oct 14 01:45:00 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA04764
          for bugs-outgoing; Tue, 14 Oct 1997 01:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs)
Received: from gatekeeper.tsc.tdk.com (root@gatekeeper.tsc.tdk.com [207.113.159.21])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA04759
          for <bugs@freebsd.org>; Tue, 14 Oct 1997 01:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from gdonl@tsc.tdk.com)
Received: from sunrise.gv.tsc.tdk.com (root@sunrise.gv.tsc.tdk.com [192.168.241.191])
          by gatekeeper.tsc.tdk.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id BAA04915; Tue, 14 Oct 1997 01:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com (salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com [192.168.241.194])
	by sunrise.gv.tsc.tdk.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA02147;
	Tue, 14 Oct 1997 01:44:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from gdonl@localhost)
	by salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA20075;
	Tue, 14 Oct 1997 01:44:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com>
Message-Id: <199710140844.BAA20075@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 01:44:49 -0700
In-Reply-To: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
       "Re: FreeBSD TCP stack and RST processing [subj changed]" (Oct 14,  1:31am)
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.6 alpha(3) 7/19/95)
To: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>, Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD TCP stack and RST processing [subj changed]
Cc: dg@root.com, bugs@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Oct 14,  1:31am, Bill Fenner wrote:
} Subject: Re: FreeBSD TCP stack and RST processing [subj changed]
} Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com> wrote:
} >It looks like this change never made it into 2.2-stable (or 2.1-stable).
} 
} It's in RELENG_2_2:

Oops, my face is red.  At the present time my primary interest is 2.1,
and when I went to update my 2.2 tree, I used the supfile for -current.

I just reran cvsup with the correct supfile and I see that the change
is there.  Nevermind ...

} |1.54.2.5 Sat Oct 4 8:54:12 1997 by davidg 
} |Branch: RELENG_2_2 
} |
} |Brought in changes from rev 1.63
} 
} >There's another change a few lines further down in tcp_input.c that was
} >made about a week ago in the 2.1-stable and -current trees, but not in
} >2.2-stable.
} 
} I assume you mean the CCECHO thing; you will find that one was committed
} to -current and 2.2-stable at the same time, and merged into 2.1 about
} a week later.  (revs 1.62, 1.54.2.4, and 1.25.4.9, respectively).

Yup, that's it.

			---  Truck