From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Apr 19 14:27:40 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id OAA29872
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 14:27:40 -0700
Received: from plains.nodak.edu (tinguely@plains.NoDak.edu [134.129.111.64])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA29865
          ; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 14:27:39 -0700
Received: (from tinguely@localhost) by plains.nodak.edu (8.6.11/8.6.10) id QAA10520; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 16:27:26 -0500
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 1995 16:27:26 -0500
From: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@plains.NoDak.edu>
Message-Id: <199504192127.QAA10520@plains.nodak.edu>
To: bugs@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org, shih@cithe312.cithep.caltech.edu
Subject: Re: some comments on the 2.0 and 3.1.1
Content-Length: 322
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>  Thus so far, only the combination of 2.0-950322 + 3.1 work for me.
>  I cannot fully use the ATI Mach64 card, but use it as a SVGA card.

for me, the XFree86 3.1 gave poor ATI Mach64 quality at 1024x768 (flickers
really bad). When using the 2.0 SNAPs here, I still am using a hand patched
XFree86 2.x Release.

--mark.