Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 09:51:12 +1000 From: Dan Carroll <fbsd@dannysplace.net> To: krad <kraduk@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS With Gpart partitions Message-ID: <4F039470.9010405@dannysplace.net> In-Reply-To: <CALfReyc11ZriFPZmm15YwS5VeA1P4Epub1vyZM%2BfC8X2X0_mHw@mail.gmail.com> References: <4F003EB8.6080006@dannysplace.net> <CALfReyfvOCMpBdndf7UYydmGnUqt2cBYWdhYXaOANbQ_CFHoVA@mail.gmail.com> <4F02FC42.1040103@dannysplace.net> <4F0311F2.7050209@brockmann-consult.de> <4F0312DF.8050004@brockmann-consult.de> <20120103162428.GA18661@icarus.home.lan> <CALfReyc11ZriFPZmm15YwS5VeA1P4Epub1vyZM%2BfC8X2X0_mHw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/01/2012 9:31 AM, krad wrote: > There has been.quite a bit of discussion on this already and I think the > safest way is to always 4k align as this works fine on.both drive types Actually that does make sense. 99% of my files on this volume (office data / media server) will be larger than 4k anyway so I guess there is nothing to lose by aligning to a 4k boundry *and* asking ZFS to use 4k block size. -D
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F039470.9010405>