From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 21 18:20:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 377B110656AD for ; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 18:20:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B66638FC15 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 18:20:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17788 invoked by uid 399); 21 Aug 2010 18:20:50 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 21 Aug 2010 18:20:50 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4C701901.8030505@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 11:20:49 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100807 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rui Paulo References: <201008191131.o7JBV4Yf002412@svn.freebsd.org> <4C6D18BE.2000905@fer.hr> <4C6D95A8.9070105@FreeBSD.org> <20100819213159.B48418@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <4C6DDB74.3090102@FreeBSD.org> <7186318F-0921-41E5-9641-3D6B45E0623B@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <7186318F-0921-41E5-9641-3D6B45E0623B@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, Ana Kukec , svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r211501 - in head/sys: modules modules/send netinet netinet6 sys X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 18:20:52 -0000 On 08/21/2010 05:07, Rui Paulo wrote: >> Meanwhile, the fact that in the past code has been committed >> without man pages is the exact cause of the problem you're >> describing. It is certainly not a justification for continuing to >> do it wrong. > > Reverting code just because it doesn't have a man page is pointless. > Everyone can write the damn man page, but not everyone can write > code. You should really take this into consideration when proposing a > commit to be reverted. So let's assume that having lots of code in the tree without a man page is a problem. Further, let's assume that we don't want the problem to get worse. How do you propose that we accomplish that? Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/ Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. -- Pablo Picasso