From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 15 18:41:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 8E01B106568D; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:41:26 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5228B106566C; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:41:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nwhitehorn@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.icecube.wisc.edu (trout.icecube.wisc.edu [128.104.255.119]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B048FC08; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:41:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.icecube.wisc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E5F582C1; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:41:25 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at icecube.wisc.edu Received: from mail.icecube.wisc.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (trout.icecube.wisc.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id F3vhpS0jEsSb; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:41:25 -0600 (CST) Received: from wanderer.tachypleus.net (i3-dhcp-172-16-55-200.icecube.wisc.edu [172.16.55.200]) by mail.icecube.wisc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A34A582A6; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:41:18 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <4B79954D.1060909@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:41:17 -0600 From: Nathan Whitehorn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rafal Jaworowski References: <201002151753.o1FHrUEx061091@repoman.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201002151753.o1FHrUEx061091@repoman.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Perforce Change Reviews Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 174731 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:41:26 -0000 Rafal Jaworowski wrote: > http://p4web.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=174731 > > Change 174731 by raj@raj_fdt on 2010/02/15 17:53:15 > > Refactor and optimize FDT infrastructure. > > - Extend 'compatible'-related routines so that we can do strict > checking i.e. if a node is only compatible with a single entry. This > is required for nodes like 'simple-bus' as sometimes other nodes > claim their compatibility and we need to have a way to identify such > cases. > These 'compatible' routines would be very useful in the regular OF case as well. Any change you could move them into ofw/openfirm? -Nathan