From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 7 05:20:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16006106564A for ; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 05:20:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU) Received: from phoebe.cse.buffalo.edu (phoebe.cse.buffalo.edu [128.205.32.89]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD7968FC14 for ; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 05:20:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU) Received: from [128.205.32.76] (bauer.cse.buffalo.edu [128.205.32.76]) (authenticated bits=0) by phoebe.cse.buffalo.edu (8.14.1/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m8754AhW011484 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 7 Sep 2008 01:04:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu) From: Ken Smith To: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20080906.224018.-1303464793.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20080906.224018.-1303464793.imp@bsdimp.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-tn97nH2oNT/qzNWtCCLS" Organization: U. Buffalo CSE Department Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 01:04:09 -0400 Message-Id: <1220763849.29265.47.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-DCC-Buffalo.EDU-Metrics: phoebe.cse.buffalo.edu 1335; Body=0 Fuz1=0 Fuz2=0 Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pax in /rescue X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 05:20:17 -0000 --=-tn97nH2oNT/qzNWtCCLS Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 22:40 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > Is there any reason to continue to include both tar and pax in > /rescue? JFYI - despite the cpio/sysinstall issues apparently being fixed I'm still planning to switch sysinstall over to using tar. I know that's not what you're "directly" asking about but it's at least "remotely related" depending on peoples' feelings about which of the two should be removed if the answer to your question is "No". --=20 Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel | --=-tn97nH2oNT/qzNWtCCLS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkjDYMkACgkQ/G14VSmup/aHtgCbBgdz+s+IZ3MiO+0FJp8mHsu4 iyEAoIwXTjL0LqzkxsJZBq+guyTO+3CP =nCVp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-tn97nH2oNT/qzNWtCCLS--