From nobody Tue Jun 9 10:21:21 2026 X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4gZQ1H6gPWz6hk1G for ; Tue, 09 Jun 2026 10:21:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hans@stare.cz) Received: from mx.stare.cz (uvt.stare.cz [185.63.96.79]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "prizen.cz", Issuer "prizen.cz" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4gZQ1H1fPtz3S8Z for ; Tue, 09 Jun 2026 10:21:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hans@stare.cz) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=stare.cz header.s=all header.b=0jHJutea; dkim=fail ("headers eddsa verify failed") header.d=stare.cz header.s=all header.b="dN p3bIS"; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of hans@stare.cz designates 185.63.96.79 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hans@stare.cz DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=all; bh=xZ6BotXruepO fvRvW3zAqDsmyXYlPOukjRNJiP99bKc=; h=subject:to:from:date; d=stare.cz; b=0jHJuteaSzy7j3KJIkSZHLauco//DhvfSzR0VVWcC606S/IAcHOcpvoxtFEwyxeQ98mK SmIE6n/cDjFpPhTtCA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=all; bh=xZ6BotXruepOfvRv W3zAqDsmyXYlPOukjRNJiP99bKc=; h=subject:to:from:date; d=stare.cz; b=dN p3bISgoCrhiw12IbNMIhH8ZougCzPcbtwY9ubfELZMqeu1EfyUI8BfLQkToy/QXvWvMLcQ toy8KqvriV3evMd+GEhBjHz7w48jy7OvCRX14MFtq3UJgCHXnuhfgeP4VQq4JXNhzHhN2g KUOUeqHPiIirEtVhhMvvfb8QtdT/UE/Kw0tH4odyoxoANqNLW8HRUB2YcJL7XcXYgvqdqJ vl8d+UWr4bsbYJ2qUEzpLgNiIx93PjCN72f3pCsxH+qIqEQNgLeIeul7XlI0VOyhVyrs1H hEWUh5sGcQmVAB4vQOgzEzdLBARwZcAcllX9g+wx6UrctY3+tBCYmuVpKAlA== Received: from localhost (stare.cz [local]) by stare.cz (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 7acbbb70 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 12:21:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 12:21:21 +0200 From: Jan Stary To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: example COPTFLAGS Message-ID: List-Id: User questions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-questions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.80 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.996]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:185.63.96.79:c]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.20)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[stare.cz:s=all]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[stare.cz:+,stare.cz:-]; R_DKIM_REJECT(0.00)[stare.cz:s=all]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[stare.cz]; RECEIVED_HELO_LOCALHOST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DKIM_MIXED(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:50825, ipnet:185.63.96.0/22, country:CZ]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+] X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4gZQ1H1fPtz3S8Z This is wht the exampla make.conf says about COPTFLAGS on my freshly installed 15.0-RELEASE: # To compile just the kernel with special optimizations, you should use # this instead of CFLAGS (which is not applicable to kernel builds anyway). # There is very little to gain by using higher optimization levels, and doing # so can cause problems. # #COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe But leaving everything at default apparently uses -O2 -pipe for the kernel build? Is the comment out of date then? Jan