From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Feb 21 14:10:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from inet03.citec.qld.gov.au (inet03.citec.qld.gov.au [203.5.10.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7C737B4EC for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:10:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgcccdc@citec.qld.gov.au) Received: by inet03.citec.qld.gov.au; id IAA29351; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 08:09:40 +1000 (EST) Received: from guru.citec.qld.gov.au( 147.132.21.132) by inet03.citec.qld.gov.au via smap (V2.0) id xma029319; Thu, 22 Feb 01 08:09:37 +1000 Received: from localhost (sgcccdc@localhost) by guru.citec.qld.gov.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA59451; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 08:09:33 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from sgcccdc@citec.qld.gov.au) X-Authentication-Warning: guru.citec.qld.gov.au: sgcccdc owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 08:09:32 +1000 (EST) From: Colin Campbell To: nino@inode.at Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "no memory for tx list"? In-Reply-To: <20010221112750.A5963@TK147108.geizhals.at> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Marinos J . Yannikos wrote: > Any hints? netstat -m shows that the peak number of mbuf clusters was the max > (4608), so that was the problem. What would be a safe high value for > NMBCLUSTERS? I run a squid box with 256MB ram and NMBCLUSTERS=8192. Colin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message