From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 28 13:41:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC96B16A4CE for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:41:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from basement.kutulu.org (211.215.33.65.cfl.res.rr.com [65.33.215.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BEA43D39 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:41:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kutulu@kutulu.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by basement.kutulu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD7C53; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 09:41:07 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4270E7F1.9010502@kutulu.org> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 09:41:05 -0400 From: Mike Edenfield User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Toxa References: <57436.216.177.243.42.1114582155.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com> <426FDE69.8090909@samsco.org> <426FE1EA.7020900@kutulu.org> <20050428105348.GA8056@laptoxa.toxa.lan> In-Reply-To: <20050428105348.GA8056@laptoxa.toxa.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: boot banner project X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:41:08 -0000 Toxa wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 03:03:06PM -0400, Mike Edenfield wrote: >> >>One possible alternative to an all-out graphics display would be a >>'prettified' text console. I'm thinking of what Gentoo and older RedHat >>systems did (haven't used RH in years, dunno if this still applies) >>where about 80% of the system log messages are hidden behind a simple >>task list: >> >>Mounting File Systems ... [ok] >>Starting xl0 ... [ok] >> >>etc. With, of course, the obligatory cyan, magenta, and bright green >>colors. While partly eye candy, I find it much easier to deal with than > > > This is the most stupid idea I've ever head. Please, PLEASE, don't waste > your time turning FreeBSD into pink lolypop. Is it already > super-perfect-mega-stable-with-all-desired-features-implemeted? IMHO if > somebody wants to spare his time and skills working on freebsd, he should choose > more useful direction for his mights and power. For example, take a look > at all these PRs... 1) It is far from a stupid idea if even one person honestly feels it would be a benefit. No need to be abusive about it. 2) If I were to choose to work on FreeBSD, I would be free to work on whatever I felt was lacking. That's how it works. Especially given that I have nowhere near enough skill in C to work on more complex system-level issues. 3) I was merely making suggestions as to what alternatives were available. Since almost every Linux distro does something similar to this proposal, there is obviously SOME merit to it; the benefit may be miniscule, or irrelevant to many people, but it still exists. --Mike