Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 15:31:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis <dl-freebsd@catspoiler.org> To: uitm@zenon.net Cc: dl-freebsd@catspoiler.org, arch@FreeBSD.ORG, iedowse@maths.tcd.ie, tlambert2@mindspring.com Subject: Re: VOP_INACTIVE() Message-ID: <200209172231.g8HMVLwr017242@gw.catspoiler.org> In-Reply-To: <200209171038.g8HAcgQ39991@uitm.zenon.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 17 Sep, Andrey Alekseyev wrote: >> The second fix is to all VOP_INACTIVE() before the reference count is >> decremented. The main problem with this is that some of the things done > > Btw, Solaris does that in vn_rele() I took a peek at NetBSD and they go to the opposite extreme. Vrele() and vrele() call VOP_INACTIVE() after the vnode has been put on the free list. It looks like they rely on the vnode lock being held to prevent bad stuff from happening. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200209172231.g8HMVLwr017242>