Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 12:02:23 +0100 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> To: Matt Connor <bsd@xerq.net> Cc: "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Default inode number too low in FFS nowadays? Message-ID: <4EB3C63F.2060805@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <5C156A63-D86D-4C1B-AFC4-DC5EA09494F6@xerq.net> References: <B888842A-7DB4-491B-93E3-A376745019F5@sarenet.es> <j8u2af$chv$1@dough.gmane.org> <5C156A63-D86D-4C1B-AFC4-DC5EA09494F6@xerq.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matt Connor wrote:
>
> On Nov 3, 2011, at 5:43 AM, Ivan Voras<ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>> On 02/11/2011 12:57, Borja Marcos wrote:
[...]
>> Did you forget to do "make clean" after "make install" on several large
>> ports?
>>
>> But yes, the ports tree is getting a bit unwieldy. On the other hand,
>> did you fsck the file system lately?
>>
>
> cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade&& make install clean
>
> portsclean -CD
>
> That's a quick way to clean out all the clutter.
Installing ruby and portupgrade is really big overhead to simple task,
which can be done by:
cd /usr/ports && make clean
or with find:
find /usr/ports/ -depth 3 -name "work" -exec rm -r {} +
Miroslav Lachman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EB3C63F.2060805>