From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun 17 18:36:23 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DD61316A4CE; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 18:36:23 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D4C5943D1D; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 18:36:23 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from bmilekic@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (bmilekic@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	i5HIa18C042761;	Thu, 17 Jun 2004 18:36:01 GMT
	(envelope-from bmilekic@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from bmilekic@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5HIa19W042760;
	Thu, 17 Jun 2004 18:36:01 GMT
	(envelope-from bmilekic)
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 18:36:01 +0000
From: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@FreeBSD.org>
To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20040617183601.GA42682@freefall.freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: Max Khon <fjoe@FreeBSD.org>
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys mbuf.h src/sys/kern uipc_mbuf.c
	uipc_syscalls.c src/usr.bin/netstat mbuf.c src/lib/libc/sys
	sendfile.2
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 18:36:24 -0000


I wrote:
> Anyway, if you were going to argue against this MFC, you would have
> been better off pointing out that it merges to RELENG_4 something
> that shouldn't even be in HEAD.  Namely, the sendfile(2) stats have
> no business in being in the mbstat struct and should have been moved
> out of there before this was MFC'd (you should consider fixing that,
> by the way, since you put them there). :-)

  Actually, I'm sorry alfred, it seems that silby put them there.
  Therefore, he should fix it and MFC the change. :-)

-Bosko