Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 18:00:40 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Jose M Rodriguez <josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: vim-lite-6.3.16 Message-ID: <20041122020040.GA12663@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20041121205219.GA1154@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <41A01DF9.9090607@sc.rr.com> <1101013587.10885.21.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20041121172706.GA26536@dragon.nuxi.com> <200411211941.15515.freebsd@redesjm.local> <20041121205219.GA1154@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 12:52:19PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 07:41:14PM +0100, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
> > El Domingo, 21 de Noviembre de 2004 18:27, David O'Brien escribi?:
> > cp> On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 06:06:27AM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > > > William Allison p??e v so 20. 11. 2004 v 23:47 -0500:
> > > > > I'm sorry but I can't seem to figure this out and haven't been
> > > > > able to get help on IRC.
> > > > [ ... ]
> > > I would more than welcome a patch for a tested vim-gtk (or vim-gtk2)
> > > slave port[*] that I could review and test.
> >
> > I use this locally for weeks
>
> This isn't a slave port. See vim-lite for an example of what I mean.
> Also your patch un-portlint's the Makefile more than it already is.
Why isn't the following suffient for a GTK slave port?
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
# ex:ts=8
# Ports collection makefile for: vim-lite
# Date created: Fri Jun 25, 1999
# Whom: David O'Brien (obrien@NUXI.com)
#
# $FreeBSD$
#
WITH_GTK2= yes
MASTERDIR= ${.CURDIR}/../vim
MAINTAINER?= obrien@FreeBSD.org
COMMENT?= Vi "workalike", with many additional features (GTK2 package)
.include "${MASTERDIR}/Makefile"
CATEGORIES+= gnome
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041122020040.GA12663>