From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 8 16:51:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF62106567A for ; Sat, 8 Nov 2008 16:51:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+3P=3090643a@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from fallback-in1.mxes.net (fallback-out1.mxes.net [216.86.168.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06238FC1A for ; Sat, 8 Nov 2008 16:51:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+3P=3090643a@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by fallback-in1.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7323164883 for ; Sat, 8 Nov 2008 11:40:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24307D051E for ; Sat, 8 Nov 2008 11:40:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 16:40:13 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20081108164013.5d74790d@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <200811081525.12583.jonathan+freebsd-questions@hst.org.za> References: <20081107031744.GA7088@shepherd> <20081107232800.GB5725@kokopelli.hydra> <20081108065558.060024b3@scorpio> <200811081525.12583.jonathan+freebsd-questions@hst.org.za> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: recommendation word processer for xfce X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:51:43 -0000 On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 15:25:12 +0200 Jonathan McKeown wrote: > On Saturday 08 November 2008 13:55, Jerry wrote: > > The best response to the issue of Outlook and top-posting I've seen > recently was on the London Perlmongers mailing list > ... > "The last I checked, cursor keys worked in Outlook just fine without > any third-party hacks, so there is no reason for top-posting just > because the cursor happens to be there. Some people argue that the cursor should start-off at the top because you should start by removing superfluous quoted text before bottom posting.