From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 13 15:49:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E361065689 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:49:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamk@voicenet.com) Received: from spamfish.visualtech.com (h-67-102-187-40.phlapafg.covad.net [67.102.187.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69F88FC28 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:49:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamk@voicenet.com) Received: from mailstore.visualtech.com (h-67-102-187-41.phlapafg.covad.net [67.102.187.41]) by spamfish.visualtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81DCD1F4386; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:46:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.35] (h-67-103-204-242.phlapafg.covad.net [67.103.204.242]) by mailstore.visualtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CAA3ADC223; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:47:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Adam K Kirchhoff To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, gary.jennejohn@freenet.de Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:47:21 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <1223134762.1619.32.camel@wombat.2hip.net> <1223663456.65664.23.camel@squirrel.corp.cox.com> <20081013173440.528d1b4e@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <20081013173440.528d1b4e@ernst.jennejohn.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810131147.21459.adamk@voicenet.com> X-visualtech-MailScanner: Found to be clean Cc: Subject: Re: drm MSI support X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:49:30 -0000 On Monday 13 October 2008 11:34:40 Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:30:56 -0400 > > Robert Noland wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 18:53 +0100, Matt Dawson wrote: > > > Sorry for the delay. I had to set up -CURRENT on this box as it looks > > > like it will be handy to test these Radeons from time to time. > > > > Yes, particularly for newer chips being on -CURRENT is going to be > > helpful. I can make patches for STABLE in most cases, but I'm already > > working with several different repos / code branches, so the quickest > > best way to get the new bling is going to be on -CURRENT. > > I tried testing this on my 8-current box, but DRM never even attaches to > my graphics controller. > > pciconf -lcv shows: > vgapci0@pci0:1:5:0: class=0x030000 card=0xd0001458 chip=0x96101002 > rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'ATI Technologies Inc' > class = display > subclass = VGA > cap 01[50] = powerspec 3 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 > cap 05[a0] = MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit > > and Xorg recognizes it as: > (--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon HD 3200 Graphics" (ChipID = 0x9610) > > but I don't see any output from DRM in dmesg.boot. > > I have > device drm # DRM core module required by DRM drivers > device radeondrm # ATI Radeon > Unfortunately direct rendering is not yet supported on your GPU. Adam -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.