From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 21 06:06:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81473106564A for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 06:06:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0805C8FC12 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 06:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.local (host109-151-154-120.range109-151.btcentralplus.com [109.151.154.120]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7L65vYJ051757 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 07:05:57 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q7L65vYJ051757 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q7L65vYJ051757; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host host109-151-154-120.range109-151.btcentralplus.com [109.151.154.120] claimed to be seedling.local Message-ID: <5033253D.4060807@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 07:05:49 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20120820194313.GC23607@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20120820232147.GD23607@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20120820232147.GD23607@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF48BE298C15150B599075B91" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL, RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL, RDNS_DYNAMIC, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Subject: Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 06:06:02 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF48BE298C15150B599075B91 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 21/08/2012 00:21, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:09:46AM +0300, Vitaly Magerya wrote: >> Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> Please [...] ask question about pkgng [...] >> >> What would be the best practice of mixing ports with packages? >> >> The use case I have in mind is compiling Xorg ports locally >> WITH_NEW_XORG and WITH_KMS, and using packages from >> pkgbeta.freebsd.org for everything else. Is there some mixture of pkg >> and portmaster flags that allows this kind of setup? >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" >=20 > There is no best practice for that unfortunatly, (as actually) the best= for you > is maybe to build your own pkgng repostories? > http://wiki.freebsd.org/PkgPrimer#Using_poudriere for example? >=20 > We are open to suggestion here :) At the moment, it is about as tricky as mixing locally compiled ports with pkg_tools packages: ie. it might work, or it might leave you a quivering, sobbing mess lost in a pit of dark despair. One thing that should help is a proposal to record metadata like the SVN revision number of the ports tree used to build repository packages into the repository catalogue (repo.sqlite), so users can in principle check out the same revision locally to build their own ports. Unfortunately no one has written that yet, and its probably too late for it to make it into release-1.0. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enigF48BE298C15150B599075B91 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlAzJUUACgkQ8Mjk52CukIw4hgCfbFlkGrYp+OjlDe3R2mzr8M6D L+wAmwfX1tb/rwAtPvubI6HFkumnbqzO =tWOV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF48BE298C15150B599075B91--