From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 13:47:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7428816A4CE; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:47:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from cs.rice.edu (cs.rice.edu [128.42.1.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817ED43D48; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:47:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from alc@cs.rice.edu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cs.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ABA74A9EB; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:47:35 -0600 (CST) Received: from cs.rice.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cs.rice.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 25345-01-9; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:47:33 -0600 (CST) Received: by cs.rice.edu (Postfix, from userid 19572) id 8C5154A9D4; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:47:33 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:47:33 -0600 From: Alan Cox To: Jeff Roberson Message-ID: <20040115214733.GV7891@cs.rice.edu> References: <20040115210511.GU7891@cs.rice.edu> <20040115162427.L36463-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040115162427.L36463-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavis-20030616-p5 at rice.edu cc: alc@freebsd.org cc: Jun Su cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PANIC in kmem_alloc when loading many modules X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 21:47:36 -0000 On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 04:25:19PM -0500, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Alan Cox wrote: > > > Please try increasing UMA_BOOT_PAGES. It's defined in vm/uma_int.h. > > I missed the begining of this thread. Are we loading modules before the > VM is bootstrapped? If we are, we should probably fix that. If not, why > do we need more boot pages? My understanding is that these are preloaded modules. There was a similar report last week that was resolved by increasing UMA_BOOT_PAGES. Alan