From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jul 11 22:38:12 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260F416A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:38:12 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1691B43D2F
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:38:12 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com)
Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 0C06872DF2; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 067B572DB5; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040711152739.W76940@carver.gumbysoft.com>
Message-ID: <20040711153746.C76940@carver.gumbysoft.com>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0407102229190.12756@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net>
 <20040711152739.W76940@carver.gumbysoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: FreeBSD current mailing list <current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: is_sk locking in sk_attach
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:38:12 -0000

On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Doug White wrote:

> On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
> > there had been some discussion lately about if_sk and attach locking.
> > compiled if_sk as module on amd64 and kldloading started a race with
> > follwoing output:
>
> If you have unpatched sk sources, the locking is entirely wrong. You
> _will_ get witness warnings.  I have a basic patch that gets rid of most
> of them, and I think bms is working on a more complete lockdown.  I posted
> my patch to -current, but I can't guarantee its entirely correct :)

Oops, bms isn't working on locking for sk.  Please disregard that
statement. :)

-- 
Doug White                    |  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
dwhite@gumbysoft.com          |  www.FreeBSD.org