From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 12 14:57:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 337CA37B491 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:57:12 -0800 (PST) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA91607; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 23:57:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Warner Losh Cc: Daniel Eischen , John Indra , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: -CURRENT is bad for me... References: <200102122119.f1CLJaW31538@harmony.village.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 12 Feb 2001 23:57:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: Warner Losh's message of "Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:19:36 -0700" Message-ID: Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Warner Losh writes: > Alternatively, the upgrade path must be fixed. I don't see any way to do that. Everything on your system that isn't statically linked will need to be recompiled unless the libc major number is bumped. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message