From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jun 21 23:54:12 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA02550 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sun, 21 Jun 1998 23:54:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from myrddin.demon.co.uk (exim@myrddin.demon.co.uk [158.152.54.180]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA02472; Sun, 21 Jun 1998 23:53:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dom@myrddin.demon.co.uk) Received: from dom by myrddin.demon.co.uk with local (Exim 1.92 #1) id 0yo0Gg-00007d-00; Mon, 22 Jun 1998 07:39:54 +0100 To: dyson@iquest.net Cc: phk@critter.freebsd.dk (Poul-Henning Kamp), hasty@rah.star-gate.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Here is what I promised :-) References: <199806212245.RAA07936@dyson.iquest.net> From: Dom Mitchell In-Reply-To: "John S. Dyson"'s message of "Sun, 21 Jun 1998 17:45:09 -0500 (EST)" X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald" Date: Mon, 22 Jun 1998 07:39:54 +0100 Message-Id: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "John S. Dyson" writes: > Maybe, but I *am* working on a scalable and forward looking kernel > that will perform about the same as a conventional kernel, except > where the conventional kernel doesn't perform well at all. The > abstractions that we are working on, work both on PC's, on SMP > PC's, multiple machines (acting essentially as one machine), and > even heterogeneous machines (in a limited fashion.) Got it! You're working on FreePlan9. :-) -- "Remember the Golden Rule: he who has the gold makes the rules" -- WoID To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message