From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 20:47:31 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D2A216A4B3 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 20:47:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u173n10.eastlink.ca [24.224.173.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D79E43FD7 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 20:47:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E650634C3B; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 00:46:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52A4345FA; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 00:46:18 -0300 (ADT) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 00:46:18 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20031010031910.GA11148@rot13.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20031010004358.L28590@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20030803200948.GA10712@lewiz.org> <200310091700.09658.kennyf@pchg.net> <20031009223612.J28590@ganymede.hub.org> <20031010031910.GA11148@rot13.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: FreeBSD-questions cc: Lewis Thompson cc: Kenny Freeman Subject: Re: Jail FS questions. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 03:47:31 -0000 On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Yes, it's a good thing that some developers are finally working on > fixing some of the problems, but the fact remains that nullfs/unionfs > *are not known to work in all situations* (indeed, I was able to trigger > unionfs bugs within a few minutes of testing last time I tried on 5.x, > over the summer). Did you submit PRs for the crashes, or, because of the 'big scary warning', did you just shrug it off as 'it doesn't work'? > On the other hand, if there are developers working on unionfs who have > run out of known bugs to fix (I'd be sceptical about this since I don't > remember any unionfs-related commits over the past 6 months or so, > although there might be some work-in-progress patches floating around), > and you're willing to sacrifice your machines in the name of testing, > then you should talk to those developers. Last unionfs related commit was on June 18th of this year, actually ...