From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Dec 3 18:46:29 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA07476 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 18:46:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ctcdist.com. ([199.3.192.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA07465 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 18:46:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from placej@ctcdist.com) Received: (from placej@localhost) by ctcdist.com. (8.8.8/8.8.7) id VAA01868; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 21:46:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from placej) Message-ID: <19981203214607.A1837@ctcdist.com> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 21:46:07 -0500 From: "John C. Place" To: spork , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rc.shutdown and init Reply-To: "John C. Place" Mail-Followup-To: spork , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: ; from spork on Thu, Dec 03, 1998 at 04:40:26PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Dec 03, 1998 at 04:40:26PM -0500, spork wrote: > Oops, nevermind, I checked out init, and I see the change was committed > late August. The thing that threw me was that the /etc/shutdown.rc > example exists only in the 3.0 branch. Could someone backport that? > Instead of waiting why not hack in a call to it yourself fot the time being? That is teh beautiful thing about open source... don't like it? change it. L8er John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message