From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 28 22:02:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF207106566C for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:02:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dudu@dudu.ro) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8818FC17 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:02:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk38 with SMTP id 38so464728qyk.13 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:02:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.211.69 with SMTP id gn5mr49863qab.167.1309298573126; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:02:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.39.210 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:02:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4d705cd0d73fb0d25cc3a017eb2eb072.squirrel@mail.stsnet.ro> <4E0A210F.7050105@sentex.net> <1414962521.20110628215530@nitronet.pl> <1722A449-718D-4403-A8F4-A3E733CD1518@lists.zabbadoz.net> From: Vlad Galu Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:02:13 +0200 Message-ID: To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.2 and MPD5 stability issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:02:56 -0000 On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:53 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb < bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > > > Perhaps it would be best to document what those particular workloads are. > Apparently, systems with small and seldom changing routing tables are good > candidates. However, the distinction is not immediately obvious by skimming > through the list archives. > > Start reading here: > http://conferences.sigcomm.org/sigcomm/2009/workshops/presto/papers/p37.pdf > > patches for documentation are surely welcome by the docs people. > > Thanks! That was a suggestion, though, not a request :) I'm one happy flowtable user. -- Good, fast & cheap. Pick any two.