From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Wed May 17 12:33:46 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04936D6ECDE for ; Wed, 17 May 2017 12:33:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0A52AB1 for ; Wed, 17 May 2017 12:33:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v4HCXjY3019424 for ; Wed, 17 May 2017 12:33:45 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 219316] Wildcard matching of ipfw flow tables Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 12:33:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: ae@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 12:33:46 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219316 Andrey V. Elsukov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ae@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #6 from Andrey V. Elsukov --- (In reply to lutz from comment #0) > Consequently a deterministically selected group of clients has to share t= he > same NAT table using a single external IP. A typical approach is to use > wildcards to match the right NAT instance: >=20 > add 2100 nat 100 ipv4 from 100.64.0.0:255.192.0.63 to any xmit ext out > add 2101 nat 101 ipv4 from 100.64.0.1:255.192.0.63 to any xmit ext out > add 2102 nat 102 ipv4 from 100.64.0.2:255.192.0.63 to any xmit ext out > ... >=20 > This approach is inefficient, tables could help. But tables does not supp= ort > wildcard masking of lookup data. With such an wildcard mask, especially t= he > flow tables could greatly improve performance. Can you provide an example how your patches solve this problem? Some commands/rules that you use for configuration would be good. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=