Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:35:09 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> To: Fred Clift <fred@veriohosting.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RBL/Sendmail Message-ID: <200006292335.e5TNZ9n10087@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:50:12 MDT." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006291649240.9837-100000@vespa.orem.iserver.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:50:12 -0600 (MDT) > From: Fred Clift <fred@veriohosting.com> > Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > > > not because any spam had been actually relayed through them but because of > > the potential for relaying using a technique that was not yet in any, let > > alone wide-spread use for relaying. > > > > I might add that the machines got added to the list by someone trying to > piss me off and waste my time. Are you all sure you are not confusing RBL, which is pretty conservative about what gets put on the list, and ORBS, which will run their test suite on any system they get a complaint about and which does test for some very obscure stuff? R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200006292335.e5TNZ9n10087>