From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 21 15:15:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56A2416A4CF for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:15:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from atwns1.omniresources.com (atwns1.omniresource.com [69.48.112.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C5243D58 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:15:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpoland@omniresources.com) Received: from antioch.omniresources.com (5x2822.omniresources.com [192.168.254.149])i9LFEvOd013734; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:14:57 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dpoland@atwdev.omniresources.com) Received: from antioch.omniresources.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i9LFEs4G044138; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:14:54 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dpoland@antioch.omniresources.com) Received: (from dpoland@localhost)i9LFErCa044137; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:14:53 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dpoland) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:14:53 -0500 From: doug@polands.org To: Brian Message-ID: <20041021151453.GA43721@omniresources.com> References: <200410211307.i9LD7KSI038258@emboss.bossbox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200410211307.i9LD7KSI038258@emboss.bossbox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' Subject: Re: Rid of those Windows Desktops! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:15:01 -0000 On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 02:07:29PM +0100, Brian wrote: > > Can people recommend some nice window managers, email clients etc ? > I support end-users running both KDE and GNOME. I personally use either WindowMaker or XFCE, depending on my mood :). Here's my observations: KDE and GNOME: Pro: Both would be best for someone coming directly from MS Windows. Both have high sex-appeal for the great un-washed masses. I know it sounds superfluous, but people's impressions are their realities. If someone coming off Windows thinks they're getting a plain-vanilla, featureless environemtn, they won't be as satisfied. If it's "cool" and has lots of bells and whistles, they *might* have a more favorable impression. Both have so many included programs, you may not have to install separate applications. Con: Both are a bear to support AND upgrade. They are huge compiles from ports and prone to tricky upgrade/compile problems. Both have way too many included programs. Most is not used but yet you must compile and support them anyway. If you're going to implement either of these two, I suggest one of the following methods for builds/updates. Builds: dedicate a machine that you can use to for building/rebuilding troubleshooting the desktop environment. When you've got it working, build packages and install them on the workstations. XDM: Even better than having these huge desktop environments running on many boxes, configure a beefy server to be an X client and have users run off the the server. It will simplify many aspects of user management and you'll only have to deploy once! Alternative. I've found a happy medium between the austerity of WindowMaker and the kitchen-sink effect of KDE/GNOME. That is, XFCE with ROX-FILER. It's light and fast like WM but featureful and good-looking. It doesn't bundle in tons of apps that you'll never use. In fact, if you use Mozilla (Firefox/Thunderbird) for browser/email, OpenOffice.org for productivity apps, you've got the majority of the apps "general" workers will need. Final caveat... I support people mostly browsing, emailing, writing documents, making HTML docs, editing graphics, occassionally ripping/burning CDs. Not power users by any stretch. If your users are developers or power users, many of the experiences I've tried to convey many not be applicable. -- Regards, Doug > Or point to some documentation on building a secure stable desktop > enviroment. >