From owner-freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Fri Feb 17 14:07:34 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-toolchain@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC739CE3511; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:07:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [192.108.105.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 IV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FBC7120F; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:07:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (bones.soaustin.net [192.108.105.22]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0B7C27F; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 08:07:32 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 08:07:31 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: Mark Millard Cc: freebsd-arm , FreeBSD Toolchain Subject: Re: arm64 libc.so.7.full link: Are the 8 "R_AARCH64_ABS64 used with TLS symbol . . ." notices a problem? Message-ID: <20170217140731.GA7285@lonesome.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:07:34 -0000 On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:14:42AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > Are these R_AARCH64_ABS64 notices expected? Are they a problem? Is the following post relevant? https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/2017-February/144857.html mcl