Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 04:22:24 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: njs3@doc.ic.ac.uk (Niall Smart) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: A web-based FreeBSD configuration tool. Message-ID: <199803021222.EAA10442@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 02 Mar 1998 12:17:04 GMT." <E0y9U9Y-0007Ko-00@oak71.doc.ic.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Cool, you caught my smiley 8) Yes, I agree that there shouldn't be any performance difference between C++ and Java admin tool except when we are dealing with very large numbers of items;however, for a newbie or a single seat work station or a small ISP there shouldn't be any performance difference between java and c++ based tools. Amancio > On Mar 2, 4:08am, Amancio Hasty wrote: > } Subject: Re: A web-based FreeBSD configuration tool. > > > > > > I never said that anything that configures system remotely should be > > > written in shell. Perl is adequate, but I rather prefer C++, which is > > > still more flexible and efficient than java. > > > > Yeap, I have to agree that C++ is significantly faster than Java for system > > configuration 8) > > I disagree, C++ may be faster than Java, but that difference is not > significant when doing GUI-type system administration. > > > Niall To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199803021222.EAA10442>