From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 25 08:40:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B66106564A for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:40:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from raven.customer.vol.cz (raven.customer.vol.cz [195.250.144.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E2988FC0A for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:40:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [172.19.10.16] (nat-application.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz [195.122.204.152]) (authenticated bits=0) by raven.customer.vol.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2P8eY1H011644; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:40:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) From: Pav Lucistnik To: Anonymous In-Reply-To: <86eiwmglso.fsf@gmail.com> References: <1237901632.1849.19.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <86eiwmglso.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-KfhXE/34mr8MoSWbLkFO" Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:40:33 +0100 Message-Id: <1237970433.41376.4.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Score: -2.02 () AWL,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 195.250.144.108 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: raven.customer.vol.cz; Sender-ip: 195.122.204.152; Sender-helo: [172.19.10.16]; ) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP multi processor compilations for everyone X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:40:43 -0000 --=-KfhXE/34mr8MoSWbLkFO Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Anonymous p=ED=B9e v st 25. 03. 2009 v 09:26 +0300: > Pav Lucistnik writes: >=20 > > If you are FreeBSD port maintainer: >=20 > I'm not one. >=20 > > > > Nothing changes for you, if you don't want. If you want to enable the > > use of multiple cores in your port, add MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=3Dyes to a block > > somewhere below dependency declarations. If you know your port does not > > handle -jX well, and want to disable it from using -jX even when user > > forces this feature, use MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=3Dyes. And that's all to it. >=20 > Not all ports build using make/gmake. Wouldn't it be better to export > the number of parallel processes so maintainer can decide whether to use > it in his port build system? For example >=20 > Is this completely discouraged? I suppose you can use internal variable _MAKE_JOBS directly. Why are you stripping -j just to add it back again? --=20 Pav Lucistnik Any Palm app requiring an 90+ page manual has lost its vision. -- words about DateBk4 on Action Names list --=-KfhXE/34mr8MoSWbLkFO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAknJ7gEACgkQntdYP8FOsoIY2gCfd8roOHfq+jGQ5G6vRdYIi/9J UIwAoLnCONmB/ptiR11qlRIrOwO+MqH6 =ZPOI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-KfhXE/34mr8MoSWbLkFO--