Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 17:18:04 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Application and command names in <title> elements Message-ID: <20030519171804.25e00041.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20030519195925.GC571@nosferatu.blackend.org> References: <20030519192255.GB74434@submonkey.net> <20030519153048.51f20a06.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030519195925.GC571@nosferatu.blackend.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 19 May 2003 21:59:25 +0200 Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 03:30:48PM -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > > > > There seems to be mixed usage of the command and manual page entities. > [...] > > When we have the choice between <command></command> and manual page for > a command name (just the name, not a command with parameters) > the manual page entity should be used. > > Marc > After reading the different replies to this, I like the way murray and ceri put it. Use the manual page entity first, and use command if the utility is mentioned again within proximity. I'll do this from now on. Thanks everyone. -- Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030519171804.25e00041.trhodes>