From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jan 24 00:28:30 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA19442 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 24 Jan 1998 00:28:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from coconut.itojun.org (root@coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA19433 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 1998 00:28:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from itojun@itojun.org) Received: from localhost (itojun@localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (8.8.8+3.0Wbeta11/3.6W) with ESMTP id RAA07763; Sat, 24 Jan 1998 17:12:35 +0900 (JST) To: "Matthew N. Dodd" cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: winter's message of Sat, 24 Jan 1998 02:57:13 EST. Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2 Subject: Re: IPv6 From: Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh Date: Sat, 24 Jan 1998 17:12:35 +0900 Message-ID: <7760.885629555@coconut.itojun.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Oops, I forgot to cc: to hackers... >I wouldn't say that a main-tree merge would be the way to go but rather a >vendor branch like the CAM stuff (i believe.) >It would allow some hacking but would not make the WIDE stuff an >'official' IPv6 stack for freebsd. hmm. I'll try to think about this and look into how CAM is developed. >> Though we haven't released snapshot for NetBSD yet (we are working >> on userland tools right now), it is on NetBSD-1.3. >When do you expect a release and would it be possible to get a kernel only >release diff? next month (Feb98). I'm stuck with my thesis work right now. I'll send kernel-only diff for NetBSD-1.3 on request, so please contact me if you would like to look into. It is almost unusable, since you don't have ifconfig for inet6 :-) (as I said we're working on it) itojun