From owner-freebsd-security Thu Nov 11 10:26: 2 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from java.dpcsys.com (java.dpcsys.com [206.16.184.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC0D15475 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 1999 10:25:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@dpcsys.com) Received: from localhost (dan@localhost) by java.dpcsys.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id KAA13979; Thu, 11 Nov 1999 10:25:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 10:25:39 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Busarow To: matt Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BIND NXT Bug Vulnerability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, matt wrote: > The ports tree currently has 8.2.1 though, I'm sure alot of people have > resorted to using this, I have. Has the maintainer of this port been > contacted yet? -matt bind builds perfectly from the source. # make stdlinks # make clean # make depend # make all # make install Done. It looks for named.conf in /etc instead of /etc/namedb but we have named_flags available or you can just symlink /etc/namedb/named.conf to /etc/named.conf which is what I do. You could also edit src/port/freebsd/Makefile.set and change DESTETC to suit. Relying on ports for crital bits such as bind and sendmail seems, uh, risky? Dan -- Dan Busarow 949 443 4172 Dana Point Communications, Inc. dan@dpcsys.com Dana Point, California 83 09 EF 59 E0 11 89 B4 8D 09 DB FD E1 DD 0C 82 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message