From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May  9 09:58:55 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B0737B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri,  9 May 2003 09:58:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PIKES.panasas.com (gw2.panasas.com [65.194.124.178])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 058B843F3F
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri,  9 May 2003 09:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from chris@pennasoft.com)
Received: from waumbek.panasas.com ([172.17.2.36]) by PIKES.panasas.com with
	SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13)
	id 2AZL3N35; Fri, 9 May 2003 12:58:52 -0400
From: Chris BeHanna <chris@pennasoft.com>
Organization: PennaSoft Corporation
To: current@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 12:58:51 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1
References: <20030508142234.GA1359@laptop.6bone.nl>
	<20030509010252.V73271@calis.blacksun.org> <3EBB3C67.7F2E5CD8@mindspring.com>
In-Reply-To: <3EBB3C67.7F2E5CD8@mindspring.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200305091258.51855.chris@pennasoft.com>
Subject: Re: data corruption with current (maybe sis chipset related?)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: chris@pennasoft.com
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 16:58:55 -0000

On Friday 09 May 2003 01:28, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Don wrote:
> > > it's not really appropriate to -current any more.  Bosko's is
> > > preferred, because it doesn't disclose the nature of the bug,
> >
> > How, exactly, is this preferred? :)
>
> It avoids a lawsuit.

    Who would be the plaintiff, and what would be the basis of the
lawsuit?

    And, why aren't Bosko's patches in the tree?

Thanks,
-- 
Chris BeHanna                      http://www.pennasoft.com 
Principal Consultant                
PennaSoft Corporation               
chris@pennasoft.com