From owner-freebsd-current Mon Sep 11 19:12:39 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id TAA16452 for current-outgoing; Mon, 11 Sep 1995 19:12:39 -0700 Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA16446 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 1995 19:12:37 -0700 Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.34]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id TAA00300; Mon, 11 Sep 1995 19:11:23 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id TAA03673; Mon, 11 Sep 1995 19:13:34 -0700 Message-Id: <199509120213.TAA03673@corbin.Root.COM> To: pete@puffin.pelican.com (Pete Carah) cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DEC 21041 In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 11 Sep 95 18:47:34 PDT." From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Mon, 11 Sep 1995 19:13:24 -0700 Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >I'm blessed with a supply of SMC cards using DEC 21041 instead of 21040; >all their new cards come this way. > >This isn't recognized by de0 driver (and may not even be recognized by >the PCI probes?). It also isn't recognized by last spring's SMC >windoze driver or diganostic, so they really did something to it. > >Does anyone know what the difference is and what patch is needed? I have a version of the driver from Matt Thomas that has this working, but I had some serious performance problems with the driver, and I haven't heard back from Matt about this...so I haven't yet brought in his changes. -DG