From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 26 00:22:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870921065671 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:22:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outK.internet-mail-service.net (outk.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF458FC1A for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:22:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from idiom.com (mx0.idiom.com [216.240.32.160]) by out.internet-mail-service.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F65F248C; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:22:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA202D600F; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:22:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4862E154.1000907@elischer.org> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:22:44 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Ullrich References: <0efb44e3c6c6603e69207eb15fec2718@localhost> <20080625135437.32e7a1f9@ayiin> <48629020.8000207@elischer.org> <48629DE0.5000407@elischer.org> <20080625195246.N83875@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , mgrooms@shrew.net, Norberto Meijome , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD NAT-T patch integration X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:22:31 -0000 Scott Ullrich wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb > wrote: >> if it would be that easy, it would have happened 2 years ago. > > What can we as a community do to assist in making this easier and doable? that is the question.. NAT-T is a very useful feature, and not having it s a strike agains FreeBSD in a lot of eyes.. (It's needed for example to talk to ASA firewalls for VPN stuff I believe). Anyhow I looked at the patch briefly and haven't seen anything horrendously terrible in it.. I'll look a bit more later but it doesn't seem to interfere with unrelated code that I can see. > > Scott > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"