From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 1 12:31:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D79E106566C; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 12:31:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from to.my.trociny@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F628FC17; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 12:31:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwc33 with SMTP id 33so3862779wwc.31 for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 05:31:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references :sender:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-type; bh=bqNf/7fEK7qxSIg9S8OIcCHJLt8Rcc3c2UBI+62+pAg=; b=k1Q+4VG66AllL4RQ0nd3iqdSFI+F8M9hyf1PCTJnkEcxC4aGqguTtx/fAYgsrxx7bX UujtrF8+iZX79XS8U+xjdz/HDjWmmIhXap0y7F99TQLegA1i4zI+we1TQLnIMFTHIEKo a7CwXxbqLwbpV10oOHnweFW07myExWI4cWPIw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:sender:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=Y51PgGxrnqR/YHYEkkRnfTh4Tn+P8I36EMZTMEppFMkytJn/xKEj8r566lHO6N0Pq7 KFq6wWa5k6v2pYcYlAq1zAt9jters7N5Mv6qNMpLCLY4T8gm63wEC7ZSj9teGCjZmJRR 0BPaAvj50FiCVloC6UOOWXDwOBcpFogXdEKyo= Received: by 10.216.121.208 with SMTP id r58mr771357weh.61.1301661100530; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 05:31:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([94.27.39.186]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x1sm1240001wbh.53.2011.04.01.05.31.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 01 Apr 2011 05:31:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Mikolaj Golub To: Pete French Organization: TOA Ukraine References: Sender: Mikolaj Golub Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:31:36 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Pete French's message of "Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:40:11 +0100") Message-ID: <86wrjei253.fsf@in138.ua3> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, pjd@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any success stories for HAST + ZFS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 12:31:42 -0000 On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:40:11 +0100 Pete French wrote: >> Yes, you may hit it only on hast devices creation. The workaround is to avoid >> using 'hastctl role primary all', start providers one by one instead. PF> Interesting to note that I just hit a lockup in hast (the discs froze PF> up - could not run hastctl or zpool import, and could not kill PF> them). I have two hast devices instead of one, but I am starting them PF> individually instead of using 'all'. The copde includes all the latest PF> patches which have gone into STABLE over the last few days, none of which PF> look particularly controversial! PF> I havent tried your atch yet, nor been able to reporduce the lockup, but PF> thought you might be interested to know that I also had problems with PF> multiple providers. This looks like a different problem. If you have this again please provide the output of 'procstat -kka'. -- Mikolaj Golub