From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Feb 17 17:17:52 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E95F37B407 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 17:17:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from web13504.mail.yahoo.com (web13504.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.175.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 626C143FA3 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 17:17:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dyeske@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20030218011750.87059.qmail@web13504.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.196.239.120] by web13504.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 17:17:50 PST Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 17:17:50 -0800 (PST) From: David Yeske Subject: Re: USE_SDL To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Kris Kennaway , ports@FreeBSD.ORG, sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG, Mario In-Reply-To: <20030218010011.GA79596@rot13.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'll make a mega diff that inserts USE_SDL=yes, removes SDL_CONFIG?=${LOCALBASE}/bin/sdl11-config, and removes SDL_CONFIG from MAKE_ENV and CONFIGURE_ENV in ports makefiles, and then test it. Should USE_SDL go anywhere particular? I was going to put it below USE_X* and USE_GMAKE, but above most other USE_* statements... --- Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 04:06:32PM -0800, David Yeske wrote: > > ok how about this? > > > > http://pigseye.kennesaw.edu/~dyeske/freebsd/patch-bsd.port.mk > > I'd like you to test the conversion with as many of the SDL ports as > you can, to make sure the patch works as expected. > > Kris > > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message