From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 28 02:31:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D3016A401; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 02:31:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darren.pilgrim@bitfreak.org) Received: from mail.bitfreak.org (mail.bitfreak.org [65.75.198.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F1C43D45; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 02:31:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from darren.pilgrim@bitfreak.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (mail.bitfreak.org [65.75.198.146]) by mail.bitfreak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01AB919F2C; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 18:31:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <44289FEF.7000008@bitfreak.org> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 18:31:11 -0800 From: Darren Pilgrim User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Poul-Henning Kamp References: <71543.1143437115@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <71543.1143437115@critter.freebsd.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: current@freebsd.org, small@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Build option survey X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 02:31:15 -0000 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <44270819.2080604@bitfreak.org>, Darren Pilgrim writes: >> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >>> The build option survey is online again, now with all the new >>> and improved build options which Ruslan has provided us with: >>> >>> http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/build_options/ >> If it's advised to use the same initial make env for building and >> installing, why perform the BuildWorld and InstallWorld tests in the survey? >> Doesn't that pretty much guarantee something will break? > > Study the table carefully, there are options that are only valid for > build- or installworld. Right, but these are make.conf options so they'll be present in the environment for both regardless of if/how they're used in either target. Why run tests with inconsistent environments?