From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 26 13:44:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5371065672 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:44:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eitanadlerlist@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f216.google.com (mail-bw0-f216.google.com [209.85.218.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED6C8FC0C for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:44:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so11191677bwz.3 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 06:44:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=V4pLWMWznR6G/2sK4PZL1aCCiaQNl/RuGOoUtHpmnZ8=; b=MEcqusS9td+s9pIMb09DDttrh8ofvkH4D/L9bNRkvfXoLILSbqQgU/WZGzPBvVkWnA Vq+u2KDEnPJ1s/C7hYK5WwmwuZYko/0IRU8HKvBAGNuOpL5kIKAYt7nZdxR2FsFEskZn Gk4OhmqyMzPkvouQoTKdQLDVBNgg/uEwDSFcU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=PufDRjKu4eloKiQcjhXayiULQRIGukUlZGvZxM/5fWxc1udNKlfYlBMs3iH6CVJ9c7 qKQjluRg+g9jwnM8ui4ue0YL0j3IYY+dM4QhFjIjWVrmvqB06GrlGqSutL7BE9wTIiKo ThztI4Vmz64I0ztBHDFTlPTiFKvG7VdrOUw1M= Received: by 10.239.159.146 with SMTP id y18mr405332hbc.196.1272289441201; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 06:44:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.193.77 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 06:43:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100426124453.GB74442@elwood.starfire.mn.org> References: <4BD3E9B8.2030109@comclark.com> <20100426124453.GB74442@elwood.starfire.mn.org> From: Eitan Adler Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:43:41 +0300 Message-ID: To: John Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Aiza , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Wpoison????? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:44:04 -0000 > I'm pretty concerned about its effectiveness. =C2=A0It appears not to hav= e > been touched since 2001. =C2=A0If it actually accomplished its goals, I t= hink > it would have been tuned up a bit, and it would be much more popular. > I've been hanging around the web quite a bit in the last nine years, and > it concerns me that I've never run into it before. I've heard of this program (and others like it) many times. The big problem with its effectiveness is that the generated emails don't actually work. Spammers generally send at least one probe message to create a "working emails" list which can sell for a higher price. There are better systems that have a pure honeypot which actually accepts mail (and add the IPs that send mail to a blacklist)