From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 19:05:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222A41065672 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:05:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spambox@haruhiism.net) Received: from mail.haruhiism.net (mail.fujibayashi.jp [IPv6:2001:470:9954:ffff::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC3E8FC18 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:05:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:9f2d:0:1::1] (omoikane.gensokyo.fujibayashi.jp [IPv6:2001:470:9f2d:0:1::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.haruhiism.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5FF2434BD8; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 04:05:20 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <4BA910ED.9040607@haruhiism.net> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:05:17 +0300 From: Kamigishi Rei User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4 ThunderBrowse/3.2.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Bethke References: <0D51507A-DE7E-4BF6-B086-A76C889F024F@lassitu.de> In-Reply-To: <0D51507A-DE7E-4BF6-B086-A76C889F024F@lassitu.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF3DBA4B95D351431DA4D5FDA" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ISC DHCP 4? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:05:23 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF3DBA4B95D351431DA4D5FDA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 23.03.2010 15:37, Stefan Bethke wrote: > When I was looking for ISC DHCP server version 4 or newer, I was surpri= sed that I didn't find any port. Am I looking for the wrong thing, or is= 3.1 really the newest version in ports? > > What are people using for IPv6? > =20 ports/dhcp6 is a nice alternative from KAME. --=20 Kamigishi Rei KREI-RIPE --------------enigF3DBA4B95D351431DA4D5FDA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLqRDxAAoJEPAgyqbDpP+eAuAH/1qLI5Re0Wp8e727qHPzJDab vHpiBkR2p/B77zdOQcZydVtkXTIh3l9btwG8mXsooMXnGfX89VzPmHGloUlEkCBz PCQgQRLB21KQfhNGkJUKBk3ud+Y7xDBdsHTD0YkizfWBK/utmKapw5NrYU1nTltF 8kFXu1J6tiD4KMQjdIJGVPY9i1Pw4JdCEXxOOlDZrewoth960p8cTSXnbZdtpOS5 u1O7GPxFTpOVx+LkNGbiG4+mRs2qZwbDUjm9eubTO9aOH5uyfF2GFp1XQyOeNZ6K EmpMAUUH2Es8d7RkO6MQ4uzhzzTNjVljbeep8K9/YXK/OU8Jb1yHcXN4wIhBLEk= =SOuS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF3DBA4B95D351431DA4D5FDA--