From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Jan  5 21:58:13 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA26891
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 21:58:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA26885
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 21:58:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA11749; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 21:58:04 -0800
To: John Dyson <dyson@freefall.freebsd.org>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Current is looking more stable these days..? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 05 Jan 1996 21:19:44 PST."
             <199601060519.VAA25359@freefall.freebsd.org> 
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 1996 21:58:04 -0800
Message-ID: <11747.820907884@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

I wasn't really "planning" on anything WRT -current, and certainly
wouldn't want to impede development.  I was merely wondering it now
might not be a good time for a snapshot of it?

					Jordan

> > 
> > In contravention of all reason, I've been running it on my gateway box
> > lately and, as of this morning's sup, things look pretty reasonable
> > (at least from the perspective of an EISA/ISA box with a 1542CF
> > controller).
> > 
> > What do -current folk think about a 2.2-SNAP pretty soon here?  Would
> > you like a grace period of a week or so to tidy up first?  Longer?
> > 
> > 					Jordan
> >
> 
> Well, I have been cleaning up some significant performance enhancements -- bu
t
> if you are planning on "stabilizing", then I DONT WANT to break anything.
> I'll hold off until the decision is made...
> 
> John
>