From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Nov 23 20:45:54 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id UAA03097
          for stable-outgoing; Sun, 23 Nov 1997 20:45:54 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable)
Received: from saturn.vision.net.au (saturn.vision.net.au [203.17.23.11])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA03085;
          Sun, 23 Nov 1997 20:45:41 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from craig@natsoft.com.au)
Received: from Win95.my.domain (portA39.vision.net.au [203.17.23.157]) by saturn.vision.net.au (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA25018; Mon, 24 Nov 1997 15:45:30 +1100 (EST)
Message-ID: <3479A106.6B6E@natsoft.com.au>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 15:45:10 +0000
From: Craig Wilson <craig@natsoft.com.au>
Organization: National Software Pty Ltd
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dyson@freebsd.org
CC: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Stability Of FreeBSD 2.2.5 CD-ROM Release
References: <199711240404.XAA01293@dyson.iquest.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

John S. Dyson wrote:
> If you are using FreeBSD in a pseudo-mission critical application, I strongly
> suggest applying the vm_page patches that have been included into the
> RELENG_2_2 code.  Also, there is an odd "delay" problem happening, and
> frankly, there is no upper level reason in the VFS or VM code that I can see.

John, thank you for your reply.

Does 2.2.2 suffer from the vm_page problem, or the delay problem?
If not then maybe I should continue to use 2.2.2 until 2.2.6 is
released.
Could you please tell me what files are required to fix the vm_page
problem?

Thanking you in advance.

Regards,
Craig Wilson
National Software Pty Ltd
-------------------------