From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jan 24 00:30:22 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA19607 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 24 Jan 1998 00:30:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from coconut.itojun.org (root@coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA19436; Sat, 24 Jan 1998 00:28:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from itojun@itojun.org) Received: from localhost (itojun@localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (8.8.8+3.0Wbeta11/3.6W) with ESMTP id QAA07196; Sat, 24 Jan 1998 16:52:23 +0900 (JST) To: "Matthew N. Dodd" cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, core@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: winter's message of Sat, 24 Jan 1998 02:37:29 EST. X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2 Subject: Re: IPv6 From: Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh Date: Sat, 24 Jan 1998 16:52:22 +0900 Message-ID: <7192.885628342@coconut.itojun.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk >> If I can merge our IPv6 code into the repository on >> freefall.freebsd.org, I can make FreeBSD-current with our IPv6 code. >> Otherwise I can't. Sorry. >Doesn't the CAM stuff and other bleeding edge projects have their own >branch for allowing development? We'll be very happy if we can merge ours into, but it is up to core-team to decide which IPv6 stack to be merged. There are several candidates such as NRL, INRIA, and others. I asked about the merge in the past several times, but the answer was "core team do not want to decide that at this moment". (how is the situation right now? >core-team) Also, the merger of IPsec part should be done very carefully. (US export-control issue, as usual...) >Which version of NetBSD does the code support? Though we haven't released snapshot for NetBSD yet (we are working on userland tools right now), it is on NetBSD-1.3. itojun