From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 15:37:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C90CDC1; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:37:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (heidi.turbocat.net [88.198.202.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5EEF1BC; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:37:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org (cm-176.74.213.204.customer.telag.net [176.74.213.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33D1D1FE022; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 16:37:03 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <54B7DECF.8070209@selasky.org> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 16:37:51 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Wolfe Subject: Re: [RFC] kern/kern_timeout.c rewrite in progress References: <54A1B38C.1000709@selasky.org> <20150101005613.4f788b0c@nonamehost.local> <54A49CA5.2060801@selasky.org> <54A4A002.8010802@selasky.org> <54A53F4F.2000003@selasky.org> <54A92ED1.2070906@selasky.org> <54A9A71E.70609@selasky.org> <54B29A49.3080600@selasky.org> <54B67DA7.3070106@selasky.org> In-Reply-To: <54B67DA7.3070106@selasky.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Adrian Chadd , FreeBSD Current , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:37:06 -0000 On 01/14/15 15:31, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 01/11/15 19:08, Jason Wolfe wrote: >> Hans, >> >> We've had 50 machines running 10.1-STABLE with this patch for the >> better part of a week without issue. Prior we would have seen a panic >> every few days at the least, so things are looking very promising on >> our front. >> >> Jason > > Hi, > > I've updated D1438 including the manual page changes needed for > timeout.9 aswell in addition to a minor fix for those using timeout() > and untimeout() and KTR(). > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1438 > > --HPS FYI: Now in -current: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/277213 Thanks for all good comments and reviews. --HPS