From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 14 9:44:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6AC14FCA for ; Wed, 14 Apr 1999 09:44:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) id BAA03096; Thu, 15 Apr 1999 01:42:06 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <3714C4F0.579FDDEE@newsguy.com> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 01:40:16 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: lsock(1) References: <15879.924101022@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > I didn't look at the code, but the functionality described in the > manpage looks cool and froody. I did. The code is smaller than the man page, actually. :-) It's just a matter of calling netstat and fstat, and correlating the results. > I take it that this signifies closure on the "Won't lsof ever be > imported?" issue. ;-) General consensus seems to be that lsof would rot if imported, making a port a much better option. If you doubt it, look at more(1). :-) -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "nothing better than the ability to perform cunning linguistics" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message