From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 20 13:34:31 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77250106564A
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:34:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sem@semmy.ru)
Received: from sunner.semmy.ru (sunner.semmy.ru [IPv6:2a00:14d0:0:20::3])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA108FC1B
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:34:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from dhcp170-160-red.yandex.net ([95.108.170.160])
	by sunner.semmy.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <sem@semmy.ru>)
	id 1RoEbH-000LVQ-5u
	for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:33:51 +0400
Message-ID: <4F196D64.6020508@semmy.ru>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:34:28 +0400
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@semmy.ru>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
	rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
References: <4F190F3F.7050302@fsn.hu>
In-Reply-To: <4F190F3F.7050302@fsn.hu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Adding setfib support to rc.d/routing
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:34:31 -0000

20.01.2012 10:52, Attila Nagy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Having multiple routing tables is a very nice and (was a) long awaited
> capability in FreeBSD. Having it since years is even more cool, because
> we can assume it's stable now.
> But not having infrastructure support for it sucks, this makes people
> hacking with rc.local or various scripts in various places.
>
> There is a(t least one) PR about it: conf/145440, which proposes a
> standard method for setting up different FIBs in a seems to be logical
> way, which is compatible with the current single routing table method of
> static_routes.
>
> Are there any objections about this PR? Is there something we can do to
> get it committed?
>


JFYI conf/132476